|
|
 |
|
|
|
An EPC RFID tag used by Wal-Mart |
|
Radio-frequency identification (RFID) is an automatic identification
method, relying on storing and remotely retrieving data using devices called
RFID tags or transponders.
An RFID tag is an object that can be applied to or incorporated into a product,
animal, or person for the purpose of identification using radiowaves. Some tags
can be read from several meters away and beyond the line of sight of the reader.
Most RFID tags contain at least two parts. One is an integrated circuit for
storing and processing information, modulating and demodulating a (RF) signal
and can also be used for other specialized functions. The second is an antenna
for receiving and transmitting the signal. A technology called chipless RFID
allows for discrete identification of tags without an integrated circuit,
thereby allowing tags to be printed directly onto assets at lower cost than
traditional tags.
Today, a significant thrust in RFID use is in enterprise supply chain
management, improving the efficiency of inventory tracking and management.
However, a threat is looming that the current growth and adoption in enterprise
supply chain market will not be sustainable. A fair cost-sharing mechanism,
rational motives and justified returns from RFID technology investments are the
key ingredients to achieve long-term and sustainable RFID technology adoption.
History of RFID tags:
In 1946 Léon Theremin invented an espionage tool for the Soviet Union which
retransmitted incident radio waves with audio information. Sound waves vibrated
a diaphragm which slightly altered the shape of the resonator, which modulated
the reflected radio frequency. Even though this device was a passive covert
listening device, not an identification tag, it has been attributed as the first
known device and a predecessor to RFID technology. The technology used in RFID
has been around since the early 1920s according to one source (although the same
source states that RFID systems have been around just since the late 1960s).
A similar technology, such as the IFF transponder invented by the United kingdom
in 1939, was routinely used by the allies in World War II to identify airplanes
as friend or foe. Transponders are still used by military and commercial
aircraft to this day.
Another early work exploring RFID is the landmark 1948 paper by Harry Stockman,
titled "Communication by Means of Reflected Power" (Proceedings of the IRE, pp
1196–1204, October 1948). Stockman predicted that "…considerable research and
development work has to be done before the remaining basic problems in
reflected-power communication are solved, and before the field of useful
applications is explored."
Mario Cardullo's U.S. Patent 3,713,148 in 1973 was the first true ancestor of
modern RFID; a passive radio transponder with memory. The initial device was
passive, powered by the interrogating signal, and was demonstrated in 1971 to
the New York Port Authority and other potential users and consisted of a
transponder with 16 bit memory for use as a toll device. The basic Cardullo
patent covers the use of RF, sound and light as transmission medium. The
original business plan presented to investors in 1969 showed uses in
transportation (automotive vehicle identification, automatic toll system,
electronic license plate, electronic manifest, vehicle routing, vehicle
performance monitoring), banking (electronic check book, electronic credit
card), security (personnel identification, automatic gates, surveillance) and
medical (identification, patient history).
A very early demonstration of reflected power (modulated backscatter) RFID tags,
both passive and active, was done by Steven Depp, Alfred Koelle and Robert
Freyman at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory in 1973. The portable system
operated at 915 MHz and used 12 bit tags. This technique is used by the majority
of today's UHF and microwave RFID tags.
The first patent to be associated with the abbreviation RFID was granted to
Charles Walton in 1983 (U.S. Patent 4,384,288).
RFID tags:
RFID tags come in three general varieties: passive, active, or semi-passive
(also known as battery-assisted). Passive tags require no internal power source,
thus being pure passive devices (they are only active when a reader is nearby to
power them), whereas semi-passive and active tags require a power source,
usually a small battery.
To communicate, tags respond to queries generating signals that must not create
interference with the reader's, as arriving signals can be very weak and must be
told apart. Besides backscattering, load modulation techniques can be used to
manipulate the reader's field. Typically, backscatter is used in the far field,
whereas load modulation applies in the nearfield, within a few wavelengths from
the reader.
Passive RFID tags have no internal power supply. The minute electrical current
induced in the antenna by the incoming radio frequency signal provides just
enough power for the CMOS integrated circuit in the tag to power up and transmit
a response. Most passive tags signal by backscattering the carrier wave from the
reader. This means that the antenna has to be designed to both collect power
from the incoming signal and also to transmit the outbound backscatter signal.
The response of a passive RFID tag is not necessarily just an ID number; the tag
chip can contain non-volatile, possibly writable EEPROM for storing data.
Passive tags have practical read distances ranging from about 10 cm (4
in.) (ISO 14443) up to a few meters (Electronic Product Code (EPC) and ISO
18000-6), depending on the chosen radio frequency and antenna design/size. Due
to their simplicity in design they are also suitable for manufacture with a
printing process for the antennas. The lack of an onboard power supply means
that the device can be quite small: commercially available products exist that
can be embedded in a sticker, or under the skin in the case of low frequency
RFID tags.
In 2006, Hitachi, Ltd. developed a passive device called the µ-Chip measuring
0.15×0.15 mm (not including the antenna), and thinner than a sheet of paper (7.5
micrometers).[6][7] Silicon-on-Insulator (SOI) technology is used to achieve
this level of integration. The Hitachi µ-Chip can wirelessly transmit a 128-bit
unique ID number which is hard coded into the chip as part of the manufacturing
process. The unique ID in the chip cannot be altered, providing a high level of
authenticity to the chip and ultimately to the items the chip may be permanently
attached or embedded into. The Hitachi µ-Chip has a typical maximum read range
of 30 cm (1 foot). In February 2007 Hitachi unveiled an even smaller RFID device
measuring 0.05×0.05 mm, and thin enough to be embedded in a sheet of paper.[8]
The new chips can store as much data as the older µ-chips, and the data
contained on them can be extracted from as far away as a few hundred metres. The
ongoing problem with all RFIDs is that they need an external antenna which is 80
times bigger than the chip in the best version thus far developed.
Alien Technology's Fluidic Self Assembly and HiSam machines, SmartCode's
Flexible Area Synchronized Transfer (FAST) and Symbol Technologies' PICA process
are alleged to potentially further reduce tag costs by massively parallel
production[citation needed]. Alien Technology and SmartCode are currently using
the processes to manufacture tags while Symbol Technologies' PICA process is
still in the development phase. Symbol was acquired by Motorola in 2006.
Alternative methods of production such as FAST, FSA, HiSam and PICA could
potentially reduce tag costs dramatically, and due to volume capacities
achievable, in turn be able to also drive the economies of scale models for
various Silicon fabricators as well. Some passive RFID vendors believe that
Industry benchmarks for tag costs can be achieved eventually as new low cost
volume production systems are implemented more broadly.
Non-silicon tags made from polymer semiconductors are currently being developed
by several companies globally. Simple laboratory printed polymer tags operating
at 13.56 MHz were demonstrated in 2005 by both PolyIC (Germany) and Philips (The
Netherlands). If successfully commercialized, polymer tags will be
roll-printable, like a magazine, and much less expensive than silicon-based
tags. The end game for most item-level tagging over the next few decades may
be that RFID tags will be wholly printed – the same way a barcode is today – and
be virtually free, like a barcode. However, substantial technical and
economic hurdles must be surmounted to accomplish such an end: hundreds of
billions of dollars have been invested over the last three decades in silicon
processing, resulting in a per-feature cost which is actually less than that
of conventional printing.
RFID in inventory systems:
An advanced automatic identification technology such as the Auto-ID system
based on the Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology has two values for
inventory systems. First, the visibility provided by this technology allows an
accurate knowledge on the inventory level by eliminating the discrepancy between
inventory record and physical inventory. In an academic study performed at
Wal-Mart, RFID reduced Out of Stocks by 30 percent for products selling between
0.1 and 15 units a day. Second, the RFID technology can prevent or reduce the
sources of errors. Benefits of using RFID include the reduction of labour costs,
the simplification of business processes and the reduction of inventory
inaccuracies.
Replacing barcodes:RFID tags are often envisioned as a
replacement for UPC or EAN barcodes, having a number of
important advantages over the older barcode technology. They may
not ever completely replace barcodes, due in part to their
higher cost and in other part to the advantage of more than one
independent data source on the same object. The new EPC, along
with several other schemes, is widely available at reasonable
cost.
The storage of data associated with tracking items will
require many terabytes on all levels. Filtering and categorizing
RFID data is needed in order to create useful information. It is
likely that goods will be tracked preferably by the pallet using
RFID tags, and at package level with Universal Product Code (UPC)
or EAN from unique barcodes.
The unique identity in any case is a mandatory requirement
for RFID tags, despite special choice of the numbering scheme.
RFID tag data capacity is big enough that any tag will have a
unique code, while current bar codes are limited to a single
type code for all instances of a particular product. The
uniqueness of RFID tags means that a product may be individually
tracked as it moves from location to location, finally ending up
in the consumer's hands. This may help companies to combat theft
and other forms of product loss. Moreover, the tracing back of
products is an important feature that gets well supported with
RFID tags containing not just a unique identity of the tag but
also the serial number of the object. This may help companies to
cope with quality deficiencies and resulting recall campaigns,
but also contributes to concern over post-sale tracking and
profiling of consumers.
It has also been proposed to use RFID for POS store checkout
to replace the cashier with an automatic system which needs no
barcode scanning. However, this is not likely to be possible
without a significant reduction in the cost of current tags and
changes in the operational process around POS. There is some
research taking place, however, this is some years from reaching
fruition.
An FDA nominated task force came to the conclusion after
studying the various technologies currently commercially
available, which could meet the pedigree requirements. Amongst
all technologies studied including bar coding, RFID seemed to be
the most promising and the committee felt that the pedigree
requirement could be met by easily leveraging something that is
readily available.